One more try

Posted on by
Reply

I’m going to Phoenix with an explicit goal of building support for better virtual communities within AAUW. I believe that there are groups that care about specific areas (STEM, public policy, etc., etc.) that could be much stronger if they had a way to connect with each other. I posted at discuss.aauw.org to try to find others interested.

I’m a fan of the software that underlies the online communities at NTEN: groups.nten.org. Ad hoc groups are easy to create and manage, there’s integration with e-mail lists, groups can be public or “private”. What other requirements would you put on this kind of system?
See also this list in the NTEN forums of other online communities.

Notes from NTEN – changes to our convention

Posted on by
1

I’ve often referred to Eric Raymond‘s, “Conventions at Light Speed: What Hackers Can Learn From SF Fandom” as having several suggestions that could enliven our conventions and make member-to-member connections easier. [The itch I’m particularly scratching is the memory of 2001 when I had breakfast with someone I hadn’t met before. It was weeks later when I found out that she had also been appointed to the Association Program Development Committee. We both new of our own appointments, but the member-member communication was so shaky we weren’t able to take advantage of that “once every two years” face-to-face meeting. Yeah, there were other governance reasons for protecting that info, but it screams for better solutions.]

In any event, I’m attending the Nonprofit Technology Conferences — www.nten.org/ntc — back at the Omni Shoreham where we met in 2005. There are a number of similarities (just about the same number of attendees), but as for the differences –

  • Vendor exhibit compressed into one time period: 3-8 the first evening. Buffet food provided. Seemed much better attended and allowed folks to connect with the vendors and set up more in depth meetings during the rest of the conference.
  • Their version of Convention Daily was slipped under the attendees’ doors about 7:30 am. It was more simply printed – black and white, stapled.
  • “Affinity Group” meetings – cf. our SIGS and caucuses – were scheduled the first day in regular breakout session time slots. I believe we could use this kind of organization much better, and having the face-to-face would help.
  • An award ceremony recognized about two dozen individuals. Could we steal time from that 21st century recognition program (or use its time in 2009 and beyond) and recognize our *members* for their work, particularly at the local level? A few categories, a collection of names, a few pictures — the slide show to back up the funny-hat recoginition is done.
  • It’s only 3 days! Day 1 is focused on networking, there’s a 4th day that’s a geekout (and not quite connected). But conference that requires 5 night stays is madness.

There are differences of course –

  • Almost everyone attending has a professional interest in the topic – revamps the funding. [Though I think we can do a better job of getting the message out to new members on why attendance at convention is so important. Particularly this year, it appears that the governance is so important, I’ve bumped into a branch president who thinks that branches support someone’s attendance primarily so that person can be a delegate. With so much information waiting to get taken back to the branches, I think that’s a shame.
  • It’s an annual conference.
  • There might be a board meeting tucked away somewhere, but though I’ve been a “member” of the organization for a few years, I’ve no idea how they are governed and there’s certainly no “business meeting” on the agenda.

It’s only day 2 of the 3 day conference. I’ll post more …

Notes from NTC

Posted on by
Reply

I just spent about three hours at the NTEN Conference, “Science Fair” — their version of the vendor exhibit. Here are a few vendors of interest to AAUW:

  • Blackbaud – their booth didn’t arrive and I didn’t really have any substantive questions about Raiser’s Edge. But they are reaching into smaller customers — “higher ed” (which isn’t small from my point of view — and growing their web-based functionality.
  • PaperThin, vendor for CommonSpot, the CMS on which the new web site will be based. I can see where AAUW needed to go with a prioprietary (rather than open source) CMS. Just hoping to see the first test sites sometime soon.
  • GoLightly – this is *very* exciting. Their software powers the NTEN affinity groups and mailing lists. It allows for user created affinity groups, some simple document management, and more. It’s offered at a price point that would put it in AAUW’s reach as an option for the kind of ad-hoc groups that I think will be a good complement to what we now know as branches.
  • Free toolkits for nonprofits: www.grassroots.org, www.insideigloo.org
  • Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning and Technology — these are the National Girls Collaborative Project folks. I had a good chat about some NGCP issues. We may yet get a representative at our North Carolina convention.

If anyone from the AAUW staff was here, I didn’t bump into them.