Category Archives: Public

Most of the information in this blog is restricted to logged in users. Items posted here will be available for general viewing.

Institutional members – NOT

Posted on by
2

Proposed Article IV Membership and Dues

Section 1. Composition. Any individual or institution who supports the purpose and mission of AAUW may become a member of AAUW. The provisions set forth in this section are the sole requirement for admissibility to membership.

I’d delete the “or institution”. We’ve gone a long way to keeping it simple. Let’s do that!

I’d add a separate article that says that institutions may affiliate with AAUW (as “partners”? some other word?) and give the board the authority to define the terms of such an affiliation. [Businesses as well as educational institutions, etc.] But I’d remove institutions from any notion of “membership” except, perhaps, to say that a requirement of the affiliation is that the primary contact must be a member (in the ordinary, people, sense).

I’ve seen conflating institutions and people get us into hairy issues with how the data is stored on members. In my experience, C/U representatives  (the people) are the ones who can provide real benefit to the organization — through the branches, through their other contacts on campus, etc. — and we need to connect with them as people, not just through their institutional affiliation. For instance, it needs to be clear that C/U representatives can join branches — this gets less clear if it is “Mega State University” instead of “Professor Jane Doe” who is called the “member”.

8/18 update: Other open discussions are occurring on the web. No need to keep this “private”.

Changes to the AAUW bylaws

Posted on by
Reply

A proposed set of bylaws for the new AAUW (formed when the Association and the Foundation combine their assets and efforts as of July 1, 2009) was distributed through e-mail chains last week. It, along with a form for member comment, should be on the web site this week.

While I will be making formal comments through the form, I’ll also be using this site to work through some of my questions about the new bylaws — but most of those articles will be visible only if you register for this site. All are welcome — my goal is just to keep these comments out of search engines and such.

Watch this space for more details.

Customizing the new AAUW PSAs

Posted on by
1

This should be easier, but …

The AAUW PSA’s are distributed as PDFs, with a fairly large block of white space, presumably for folks to put in local information. Now, not being one to do cut and paste to merge information — and wanting to be able to send the PDF to the copy shop electronically, I needed another solution.

I finally killed off my version of Acrobat 5 (purchased in 2003; it broke when I installed v8 of Reader) and have been moderately happy with CutePDF Professional as a replacement. So here are the steps I used:

  1. Download the high resolution, color version of a PSA
  2. Open it with CutePDF Pro
  3. Click the form editing option
  4. Drop a text box into the white space
    • On appearance tab: change font size to 10
    • On options tab: change alignment to center and check the multiline box
  5. Go back to viewer and save the file with a new name
  6. Now open the new file with CutePDF Filler
  7. Enter informational text into the box (web address, phone number, etc.)
  8. Save the file with *another* name.
  9. Open that file (again!) with CutePDF Filler. [Maybe I wasn’t patient enough, but the text that I entered seemed to disappear on the save. When I opened the file again, it was, however, still there.]
  10. Finally use the “Flatten Form” menu option to save the file one more time.

As I said, this should be easier. On the other hand, when I skipped some of the steps, after I sent the PDF to the copy center, the text I entered had disappeared. [I sometimes had the same problem with Acrobat — and the “type onto the PDF feature.”] So I’m documenting it here in case anyone else wants to try this.

If you want the PDFs with the boxes (the version created in #5 above), let me know and I’ll post them somewhere. If you’ve got a better way to do this (on the cheap), please post.

Quick notes from Women Who Tech Telesummit

Posted on by
Reply

4/2 update: See housewifery.wordpress.com/  for live blogging on these and other sessions. [If the telesummit’s no longer on the front page, start at this post and look for earlier ones.]

Earlier today, I virtually attended four sessions from the Women Who Tech Telesummit. This free series of webinars brought together some amazing folks thinking about Women and Technology from a number of points of view. Check out the sponsors and organizers on www.womenwhotech.com, and thank those that you know!

The slides and audio will be available on the website, but here are a few highlights from the sessions I attended.

I. Build An Online Campaign And Save The World

  • Graphic tip: use faces and eyes
  • Lists of tools: TechSoup.org, Idealware.org, SocialSourceCommons.org
  • TODO: check out networking at Care2.com
  • Message rates: Encourage at least one advocacy action per month [What does this mean for the list alerts@ncwu.org which goes quiet for months at a time between sessions?]

II. Women and social capital

Tara Hunt, the moderator has an upcoming book that addesses this issue. She framed the conversation with some “big ideas”

  • Mentioned Robert Putnam’s Bowling Alone and the distinction between “bonding capital” and “bridging capital”. Women build more of the first, while men create more of the second. [I think I missed that on reading it. But the book is one reason I’m so engaged in AAUW.]
  • Pew Internet Research: Women’s use of social networking is (understandably) more anonymous. Men are more likely to be open, hosting an audience, more likely to mentor/support each other.

The session then was a conversation with Joan Blades and Arianna Huffington. I’ll need to get the podcast and relisten.

III. Women and Open Source

  • Included a discussion of “hacker culture” which, though I’ve been working with Open Source since 1982, I’ve never really embraced. Developers lists tend to have blunt talk about how code can be improved — but the suggestion was to learn take criticism as encouragement. It’s when you’re being ignored that you need to think about finding a new community: if your comments aren’t worth criticizing …
  • This leads to a discussion of “finding the right community”. Open Source work can be seen as participating in a “karma bank” and it’s not often obvious how to choose the right community where your contributions can be effective (and so you can repay what you’ve received from other projects). There was a suggestion that open source projects evolve and that later in their life cycles they are more accepting of work like documentation, user interface analysis, etc. If that’s your area of expertise, you might also choose “end user friendly” projects instead of those like coding the kernel. Another example was the Drupal dojo community where “newbies train newbies”. [There’s been a recent discussion on the Systers list about women in open source. The recording of this session may be of interest there.]
  • See FlossPols.org for information on policy issues related to open source.
  • LinuxChix was mentioned in a couple of contexts. In particular their courses include “Spineful Living” (as opposed to Spineless). I think the archive for that course can be found at http://mailman.linuxchix.org/pipermail/courses/2007-April/thread.html.
  • A slide with a list of resources, included PHP women, DrupalChix — see the recording for others.
  • Ended with a discussion of nonprofit open source: Larger involvement in women, very friendly, respect contributions other than code. CiviCRM, Organizer’s database, were two projects that were mentioned.

IV. Web 2.0: Hot Or Not?

Beth Kanter’s slides are posted on her blog. I made the following notes.

  • What’s new is ease of creating content, ease of shaping audiences
  • Choose tools that match demographics and “technographics” [I think we’re considering this with Facebook for AAUW.]
  • Slide from Forrester Research — demographics and use of social networks gave an interesting picture of age vs. ways of participating. [Click through to the version on slideshare, then go to slide 12 and hit Full Screen in the lower right.]
  • Learn techniques for listening — case study from Red Cross
  • It’s about conversations
  • Be careful with staff roles – need those who are familiar, but all need to understand; define a box — discussions about the downside. [Easter Seals — written policy on social networking, code of professional behavior.]
  • Thoughtful experimentation. Different messaging on different networks.
  • How do we make it safe to fail? to learn?
  • It takes time — 2 hrs/day minimum; Sisyphean task to see ROI

Connie Reece: Case study of the Frozen Pea Fund

  • Amazing story. From first tweet to engage a community (12/5/07) to 501(c)3 formed (2/20/08).
  • Dollar investment may be small. Consider ROI in terms of “return on involvement,” “return on influence”.
  • Social media: intersection of sociology, media, technology. New tools to do what’s been done for some time.

Heather Holdridge, Care2.com

See the recording to her answers/comments on some of these topics:

  • Web 2.0 meeting human needs
  • What makes campaigns work?
  • Who should try social networking campaigns?
    Lots of volunteers, huge email networks, dedicated staff, max’d e-mail marketing
    Not free – will need dedicated resources
  • 1.0 vs 2.0 – Save Darfur; $415,000 in 10 days through e-mail (M&R consulting) vs. $15,000 in 6 months from 1 million “friends”
  • Compare/contrast Social network, website
  • Goals (success?) – Awareness and Outreach (yes), Advocacy (some), Fundraising (minimal)
  • Social network ROI calculator – frogloop.com/social-network-calculator
  • What metrics? Might not be money or actions taken. [For me and our small Facebook experiment, I think the key metric is the number of members moved from the periphery of the organization to real participants in significant communications projects.]
  • IFAW – case study; campaign specific pages

Q&A

  • Digital natives vs. digital immigrants: check Pew Internet studies, Forrester, the digital native wiki – how young people are using social media
  • Go deep on one platform – allow friends to spread to other platforms

Beth: beth.typepad.com
Connie: everydotconnects.com
Allyson: www.radcampaign.com/blog/
Heather: www.care2.com/politics

Small step for AAUW tech

Posted on by
Reply

The Member Services Database allows certain branch and state officers to download a branch roster in CSV format. Sometime earlier this month, some technical issues with the format were corrected so that it can now be used unaltered as a data source for mail-merge documents.

Hooray! [Though this does add one more thing to the TODO list: writing up the instructions for folks to run mailing labels, address lists, and more.]

Shades of my AAUW NC 2000 Convention talk on how to use your PC to improve branch efficiency and effectiveness. [Information overload in 2000? Hah!]

And I hope Betty is looking down and smiling …