<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Branch certification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://change.bbvx.org/2007/02/branch-certification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://change.bbvx.org/2007/02/branch-certification/</link>
	<description>Musings of a sometime AAUW member</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Shoemaker</title>
		<link>http://change.bbvx.org/2007/02/branch-certification/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Shoemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://change.bbvx.org/2007/02/branch-certification/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Idea from the American Society for Quality. They ask the same 29 questions of all their members each year and then provide the chapters with a scorecard on how they&#039;re doing relative to others across the country. Questions include &quot;overall satisfaction,&quot; &quot;value for the $&quot;. Compare to our &quot;branch recognition&quot; process that puts the branches in the position of trying to &quot;please&quot; the Association and the national leaders. Wouldn&#039;t we be better off if we had metrics on how well the branch is doing in trying to &quot;please&quot; its members?

Of course their chapters may be much larger than ours and less amenable to gaming the vote to make friends look better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

